3 feet sign.png

THE THREE FEET

for

SAFETY ACT:

“Proving a Violation”

In an effort to increase Safety on California roadways, Governor Brown recently signed into law AB1371, effective September 16, 2014. The new law requires a three-foot buffer by motorists passing a bicyclist. It will be codified in California Vehicle Code Section 21760(b).

If a motorist cannot pass with three feet clearance, he must slow down to a reasonable and prudent speed before passing. In other words, no tailgating or reckless passing is allowed. This is critical as 40% of all fatal crashes between a bicyclist and a motorist are caused by collisions from behind.

So what does this mean when riding the streets? Let’s walk through a few scenarios that allow you to enforce the law.

Assuming you’re riding single file and no bicycle lane exists. In theory, any bus or vehicle that “buzzes” you or fails to decelerate before safely passing can be cited. This clarification in the law is helpful because motorists often misjudge distance between their vehicle mirrors or a bicyclist’s speed when passing the bicyclist. Instead of allowing to pass at a “safe distance without interfering with the over taken bicyclist” under CVC 21750, the new statute adds objectivity, a yard stick if you will, to the distance.

Bicyclists know how frightening it can be to be nearly side-swiped (or buzzed) by a passing bus or a large vehicle. Bus violations can be proven by recording the license plate, bus number, route and time. Newer busses have windshield and side-mounted digital cameras as well as Zonar GPS data systems and black box electronics that record driving patterns. If you are “buzzed” by a bus or if you witness a clear violation and have a witness to corroborate your story, write North County Transit or First Transit and demand the violation be placed in the driver’s personnel file. Ultimately, these entities become liable for negligent retention of bad drivers.

A reasonable interpretation of the new statute is that the three-foot law may be applied when a motor vehicle unsafely passes a bicyclist, as well as when the motorist repositions himself into a lane. A common situation arises when the motorist begins a pass, then prematurely moves back into the lane but fails to correctly judge the vehicle’s right rear quarter panel in relation to the bicyclist.

​A three foot violation may also occur when the motorist fails to correctly estimate the speed of the bicyclist he passes, and then makes an illegal “right-hook” turn in front of a bicyclist.

In each of these cases, the new three-foot law is triggered in conjunction with other Vehicle Code violations, including unsafe turning movements and violating the right of way of the bicyclist. Remember, bicyclists have the same rights and duties as a motorist, so it helps if the bicyclist is law-abiding when asserting his rights. This includes lawfully riding as far to the right as practicable and not unreasonably impeding traffic behind you.

The legal effect of such Vehicle Code violations is to create a presumption of negligence when alleged in a negligence lawsuit. This is a powerful tool in litigation because fault becomes easier to prove.

Another way to prove a three-foot violation, (besides using a Go-Pro or Contour helmet video camera or credible witnesses), is documenting physical evidence such as a scratch, dent, or a paint transfer on a motor vehicle to establish the vehicle’s unsafe position. This proves a violation when the motorist is in denial.

Many expert Accident Reconstructionists also look for gouge marks in the roadway that correspond to scrapes on bicycle parts. Again, this shows the location of initial impact, thereby proving a violation of unsafe passing statutes.

This law has further legal ramifications. Violators can suffer DMV points which implicate the negligent operator suspension laws. Too many points means the loss of license. If caught driving on a suspended license, the result is a misdemeanor with large fines and jail potential.

Should the crash be serious enough, the violator may also undergo a license re-exam, initiated by a reporting bicyclist or officer. (See my article “DMV Justice – Motor Vehicle Re-Examination Process” explaining that procedure.)

In the end, this new three-foot law helps limit the defenses that insurance companies and violators can use to escape responsibility. I hope the above analysis will assist you in obtaining justice and ensure that motor vehicles safely share the road with us.​

©Richard L. Duquette, Esq. All rights reserved 2017 – LEGAL ADVERTISING

www.911law.com * 760-730-0500 * Podcast: Bicycling and The Law 911law.com

The information in this article is for general information purposes only. The focus of this article is on California Law. You should contact an attorney in your state for case specific advice, as details of the law and procedural requirements vary from state to state. Nothing in this article should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship; and the receipt, reading, listening, or viewing of this content shall not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Nothing in this article shall be construed as a warrant, promise, or guarantee about the outcome of your case or any other matter. This information may contain personal impressions or statements of opinion on a subject that do not apply in your case. Further, statements of law reflect the current state of the law at the time of writing and/or recording, and may not reflect subsequent changes in the law.    


Duquette-Four-Tips-1.jpg

The Law Offices of Richard Duquette

Good News for Bicyclists – Williams V. County of Sonoma Appeal

There is good news for bicyclists in a new appeals court case (Catherine Williams V. County of Sonoma) that widely affects ALL bicyclists in California with regard to “Assuming the Risks of Dangerous Roadway conditions“. Read More


insurance graphic with logo.jpg

CYCLISTS: DON'T SKIMP ON INSURANCE©

By: Richard L. Duquette, Esq.

BUYING STRONG INSURANCE coverage is a necessary evil. I often wonder if it is worth it to spend the money on skyrocketing insurance premiums. I hate giving my hard-earned money to Insurance Corporations because all too often I see these same organizations litigate deserving bicycle injury victims' cases. Still, if you are severely injured by a careless or hit-and-run driver who is uninsured or underinsured (UM/UIM), you face an avoidable financial nightmare. It is one of the risks of riding, driving, or jogging on public roads. The problem is that medical care is expensive, and the severely injured (or their families) are often left maimed or dead without a financial cushion.

A solution that many bicyclists are unaware of is to carry strong automobile uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) motorist coverage policy limits, because it will protect you not only in your car but also if you are hit by a car while on your bicycle or on foot.

This seems counterintuitive that a bicycle injury is covered by your auto insurance carrier. But it is true. In other words, you don’t have to be in an automobile to recover from your auto insurance policy – you could be riding your bicycle or walking across the street, even if your insurance policy language limits your recovery only to an injury sustained while riding in a car. To hold otherwise is against public policy because it excludes what is allowed in the California Insurance Code. Our local Court of Appeal said it best by explaining that, UM/UIM benefits flow to you whether you are “in a motor vehicle, on a horse, motorcycle, bicycle, or stilts when injured by an uninsured or underinsured motorist.”

Should your insurance carrier deny coverage, you may have a bad faith claim against them and a right to attorney fees to enforce your lawful rights guaranteed to you when you pay premiums. So, I recommend you spend a few extra dollars per year and increase the UM/UIM coverage (and medical payments provision) of your automobile policy to $500,000.00, ideally with a “back up” $1,000,000.00 “umbrella” policy.

In conclusion, I have to admit, when an injured client brings in an insurance policy declaration page outlining strong limits of coverage, I love insurance companies - because not only will I get paid if I have to litigate the case, but the injured athlete will often receive a settlement commensurate with their serious injuries – regardless of the careless or hit and run driver’s uninsured or underinsured coverage status. 

More information about this topic can be found on the Bicycling and the Law PodCast

www.911law.com 

©Richard L. Duquette, Esq. All rights reserved 2017 – LEGAL ADVERTISING

www.911law.com * 760-730-0500 * Podcast: Bicycling and The Law 911law.com

The information in this article is for general information purposes only. The focus of this article is on California Law. You should contact an attorney in your state for case-specific advice, as details of the law and procedural requirements vary from state to state. Nothing in this article should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship; and the receipt, reading, listening, or viewing of this content shall not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Nothing in this article shall be construed as a warrant, promise, or guarantee about the outcome of your case or any other matter. This information may contain personal impressions or statements of opinion on a subject that do not apply in your case. Further, statements of law reflect the current state of the law at the time of writing and/or recording, and may not reflect subsequent changes in the law.